Protectionism: Trade Policy in Democratic Societies by Jan Tumlir Read

Many factors appear to underlie the increasing willingness of governments to adopt restrictive merchandise measures, even while reiterating their basic commitment to an open and liberal trading system. The survey in the preceding section leads to the decision that the issue is circuitous, that a multiplicity of factors—economic and social—are at work, and that explanation must be sought in terms of the interaction of these factors.

Contempo experience suggests that perhaps the near crucial factor—and the one most likely to influence policy choices toward protection—is the extent and duration of existing unemployment, both overall and sectoral, or the threat of increased unemployment. In a period of loftier unemployment, peculiarly if there is serious unemployment in sectors open to competition from imports, the demands for the government to take action may become politically hard to resist. And the case for affirmative government action may appear all the more compelling if the affected industry is heavily concentrated in certain regions, thus making the economic well-being of those regions dependent on the maintenance of activity in that industry.

A number of factors, both cyclical and structural, accept been held responsible for the severity and persistence of current unemployment and the consequent resurgence of protectionist sentiments. These include the decline in domestic and strange demand associated with the recession of recent years, the increasing international contest, large-calibration additions to global capacity in sure sectors, the difficulties of making structural adjustments in industrial countries, demographic trends, and short-term monetary disturbances.

While the relative importance of these various factors differs from one sector to some other and among countries, one or more than of them have contributed to the emergence of protectionist pressures in all major sectors recently afflicted by trade measures. Thus, the contention that recovery from the recession will by itself eliminate the pressures for protection must be examined confronting this background.

Cyclical Factors

The pressures for protectionist deportment have intensified since the worldwide recession of 1974–75. The characteristics of this recession demand non exist elaborated. Information technology may, all the same, be recalled that its onslaught was more rapid and dramatic than that of previous postwar downturns, that information technology was unusually severe and tenacious, and that information technology affected all major industrial countries at the same fourth dimension. The volume of world trade and the real output of the industrial countries actually declined in 1975 (Tabular array v).

Tabular array 5.

Growth in Real Output of Industrial Countries and Book of Imports, 1962–77

(In per cent)

article image

Sources: National reports and Fund staff estimates.

Compound almanac rates of alter.

Data on unemployment in the major industrial countries in 1970–77 are given in Tabular array 6. In all the 11 countries, unemployment past 1975 was at or above previous postwar high rates, and in several countries the rate continued to rise in 1976 and 1977.

Table 6.

Selected OECD Countries: Unemployment Rates, 1970–77one

(In per cent of labor force)

article image

Source: National statistical records.

The data are based on labor force sample surveys (Canada, Italy, Japan, and The states), unemployment office statistics (Belgium, France, Federal Democracy of Germany, Netherlands, and United Kingdom), unemployment insurance statistics (Ireland), and merchandise union benefit statistics (Denmark).

Cyclical factors have been held responsible for shortfalls in demand in several sectors, including footwear, meat, and shipbuilding. They take been emphasized in detail in the case of the steel manufacture, which is subject to a pronounced stock cycle, making the industry very sensitive to changes in economical weather. The weakness of domestic demand was peculiarly marked for structural steel, attributable to depressed activity in construction. For example, in 1975 lonely full credible consumption of steel fell past 17 per cent in the oecd countries equally a whole and by more than 20 per cent in several of them. The contraction of domestic markets sharply intensified the pressure level to detect new outlets. There were frequent complaints that much of the steel that entered earth merchandise in 1977 was sold at beneath cost.36

While the weakness of globe demand has been held responsible to a large extent for the current issues of some industries, the furnishings of the world recession on demand and production have brought to the fore some longer-term structural difficulties due to other reasons, such as the creation and probable continued existence of significant excess capacities. Thus, while the recovery of world demand would alleviate electric current difficulties, the bug are non likely to be solved for some fourth dimension and are likely to recur in the future. In addition, the long gestation catamenia of investments in some sectors and the difficulty of slowing down ongoing projects will add further to excess capacities equally projects initiated in earlier years (by new and former producers) are completed. These issues are discussed in more detail below.

Competition from Imports

One of the most frequently cited arguments for resorting to trade restrictions—whether avant-garde by industry or trade union spokesmen pressing for specific actions in particular sectors, or by governments to explain the reasons for a particular restriction—is the increase in imports. At the industrial or sectoral level, apart from the implied or stated contention that the lack of employment opportunities is the upshot of higher imports, the statement for protectionism is often couched in terms of a particular industry'south "exposure" to imports or of its "dependence" on imports and, past implication, on the decisions of foreign suppliers to produce or to sell to the domestic market place. Since the oil crisis of 1973, such arguments appear to have gained greater currency and are frequently presented in terms of domestic and foreign market shares, or import-penetration ratios, i.e., the proportion of domestic consumption (production minus exports plus imports) accounted for by imports. Decisions by importing countries to impose import quotas or to enter into consign restraint arrangements oftentimes take into account the increased degree of import penetration in a particular sector, and the level of restrictions is set, implicitly at least, in relation to some concept of a desirable or optimal level of imports or of import penetration. For example, recent investigations by the U.S. International Trade Commission covering a wide range of U.S. industries petitioning for one or another form of import relief include data not simply on imports just also on import-penetration ratios.37 Also, the explanations given by French government of the concept of "organized costless merchandise" include references to the presumably unacceptably high levels of import penetration.38

In recent years, the justification for protectionist deportment has been increasingly based not on the level of, but on the rate of change in, import penetration, oftentimes in conjunction with the identification of the exporting countries virtually responsible for this change. As shown in the preceding section surveying merchandise actions, import-penetration ratios have risen sharply in a relatively short period in some instances, and near of the restrictive trade measures adopted by industrial countries in contempo years have been in response to imports from Japan and from developing countries.

The growth and dynamism of Japan as an industrial nation and a main force in globe trade have become a major cistron in international trade discussions. Japan's trade surplus increased significantly in recent years in spite of well-nigh total dependence on imports of oil and other key raw materials. The increment was due to sharply college trade surpluses in semimanufactures and manufactures: the deficit in respect of near all other major categories widened, in some cases significantly, since the mid-1960s. More specifically, the sharply higher trade surpluses in semimanufactures and manufactures since 1970 take been due almost entirely to trade in iron and steel and in engineering products, as Nihon restructured its export merchandise away from minor consumer goods toward heavy manufactures and technologically advanced appurtenances (Chart 1). These developments are also reflected in Nihon's share of globe imports of these bolt, which for fe and steel increased from 17 per cent in 1970 to 24 per cent in 1976 and for engineering products increased from nine per cent in 1970 to 13 per cent in 1976. Comparable cross-country information, which would go far possible to assess the effect of such developments on the Japanese share of strange markets for these products, is generally not available, but it is likely that the Japanese share increased noticeably for numerous other products. Information on Japan's share in globe imports are given in Appendix Iv.

Chart 1.

Nautical chart i.

Trade Balances of Nippon and Developing Countries

(In billions of U.S. dollars)

Source: Based on information provided by the GATT secretariat. Comparable data for 1971 are not available. 1 Excluding oil exporting countries.

  • Download Effigy

In the case of developing countries, while both the overall trade deficit and the deficit in trade in articles widened considerably in recent years, at that place was a noticeable improvement in the rest of merchandise in textiles and clothing (Chart one). The share of developing countries in globe imports of habiliment rose from 22 per cent in 1970 to 32 per cent in 1975 (run into Appendix V). The share of imports from developing countries in the credible consumption of major industrial countries increased from ii.6 per cent in 1971–72 to 3.half-dozen per cent in 1973–74 in respect of textiles and from 4.one per cent in 1971–72 to 6.0 per cent in 1973–74 in respect of wearable (Appendix VI). The level of import penetration remains depression even for textiles and wear taken as a whole, only data on more disaggregated product categories would show much higher levels important penetration.

Developing countries have emerged in recent years as serious competitors in a widening range of manufactured products.39 The associated changes in the pattern of merchandise resulting from this development run counter to traditional perceptions of international trade, in which industrial countries exported manufactures in exchange for raw materials.forty The increased competitiveness of exports from developing countries, peculiarly in the more traditional export lines (e.thou., textiles, clothing, footwear, and other consumer appurtenances), is generally ascribed to lower labor costs. The potential comparative advantage on business relationship of lower labor costs (which, of grade, could exist first by productivity differentials) is illustrated by the following tabulation of hourly wage rates in the clothing industry in thirteen adult and developing countries in August 1976 (wage rates are in U.S. dollars): 41

article image

The increase in imports from depression-price sources has created problems for some industries in industrial countries, especially those that are relatively labor intensive, have higher labor costs, and are unable to increase productivity to ensure their connected competitiveness. For example, in the eec in the period 1972–75, the number employed in material and clothing enterprises with 20 or more workers was reduced from ii.84 1000000 to two.51 one thousand thousand, and the reduction may have been as high as half a meg if smaller enterprises are taken into business relationship. More half of the reduction in employment, or 168,400, took identify in the ready-made article of clothing industry, which in 1975 accounted for 43 per cent of employment in the eec cloth and habiliment industry. In improver, 76,600 jobs were lost in the knitting manufacture, 45,400 jobs in the wool manufacture, and 31,200 jobs in the cotton industry. In the United States, employment in the apparel manufacture in 1975 was nearly ane fourth below its 1969 peak. As another example, between 1970 and 1976 employment in the footwear industry declined by 20 per cent in the U.s.a. and by about x per cent in Canada. Although the increase in imports cannot exist held entirely answerable for the sharp declines in employment, it has been responsible for much of the periodic resurgence of protectionist pressures in these sectors.

It has been claimed that lower wages impart an "unfair" advantage to foreign competition. Imports from low-wage countries have been characterized every bit "social dumping." A give-and-take of these claims, charged as they are with social and ethical overtones, is beyond the scope of this study. They announced to be a variant of the "cheap labor" arguments of an earlier period and as such are substantially an attack on the concept of comparative advantage and efficient allocation of resources. Claims of "social dumping" have in detail been used in support of demands for restrictions on imports from developing countries of textiles, clothing, footwear, and consumer electronic equipment—sectors in which the share of developing countries in world trade has grown particularly rapidly in recent years.42

Rapid Emergence of Backlog Capacities

For some industries, the bug associated with significant excess capacities can be expected to be alleviated as amass demand continues to recover. For other industries, however, excessive additions to capacities in recent years take resulted in structural imbalances that the recovery of demand can be expected only to alleviate, not to eliminate. 2 primal sectors subject area to these latter atmospheric condition are steel and shipbuilding.

Steel

Whereas equally recently every bit 1974–75 at that place were fears of a worldwide steel shortage, contempo projections betoken that demand will fall brusque of supply through 1980, and on the footing of current production plans the residue betwixt world supply and consumption may non begin to be restored until 1985.43 The imbalance between capacity and production in the oecd countries of Europe is shown in Chart 2. Large additions to capacity were likewise undertaken in new sources of supply (Brazil, the Republic of korea, South Africa, Eastern Europe, and some other developing countries). Products from these sources, often produced at lower price, compete with traditional suppliers, non only in the latter'due south domestic markets simply also in export markets.

Chart 2.

Nautical chart 2.

Actual Investment Expenditure, Crude Steel Chapters, and Crude Steel Product: Trends in OECD Countries of Europe Since 1960

Source: OECD, The Fe and Steel Manufacture in 1975 (Paris, 1977), p. 45. 1 Excluding Kingdom of norway from 1964 to 1967, excluding Turkey in 1964 and 1965, and including Finland since 1968. including Finland since 1968. 2 Including Republic of finland since 1968.

  • Download Figure

Between 1974 and 1977, employment in the eec steel industry declined by some 60,000, or by about 8 per cent of the total work force in this sector, and in the third quarter of 1977 some 91,000 employees were working part time. In the United States, employment in the fe and steel manufacture declined from 458,500 in 1965 to 403,100 in 1970 and 339,000 in 1976.

Given the social and political importance of each nation's steel manufacture—stemming in particular from the concentration of steel plants in sure geographic regions and the strategic role ascribed to the industry—agreement on sharing the costs of restructuring is likely to be difficult to achieve. Furthermore, given the technological characteristics of the manufacture, insistence on maintaining production facilities in every land would effect in permanent backlog capacities. Thus, although in the curt term the prospects for a recovery of demand for steel products will depend crucially upon the step of general economic recovery, the structural problems in the steel sector will require the adoption of specific longer-term policies to promote adjustment.

The major producing countries take, in principle, already recognized the need to evolve such longer-term adjustment policies. Thus, the oecd advert hoc Working Group on the Steel Industry concluded in November 1977 that "sustained priority attention must be given to the long-term need of restructuring and modernization, where necessary, to promote a rational allocation of productive resource with an aim to achieving fully competitive enterprises," and that "any immediate measure must be consequent" with this longer-term objective "equally well as with the gratis and fair flow of international trade." 44

Shipbuilding

A serious worldwide imbalance between productive chapters and demand has also emerged in the shipbuilding manufacture. The roots of the trouble can be traced to the highly optimistic forecasts of futurity demand made in the 1960s and early 1970s, which were based on the rapid globe economical growth experienced in those years. These forecasts were translated into commensurately heavy investment and a large expansion of capacity. The problem of backlog capacity was apparent fifty-fifty earlier the oil crisis of 1973, and in that location would accept been serious difficulties even in the absence of the subsequent sharp decline in need for tankers. The development of the share in production of both new and old shipbuilding countries is shown in Table seven.

Table 7.

Shipbuilding: Shares of World Production, 1955–76

(In per cent of grt)

article image

Source: Commission des Communautés Européennes, Assainissement du secteur de la structure navale dans la Communauté (Brussels, December six, 1977), p. 2. Or encounter "Rationalization of Shipbuilding Sector in Community," in Europe Documents, Agence Internationale d'Data pour la Presse (Brussels), No. 979, December 23, 1977, p. three.

Association of Westward European Shipbuilders (EEC countries, Finland, Kingdom of norway, Portugal, Espana, and Sweden).

Almanac world production during 1974–76, based on orders received in earlier years, rose to well-nigh 33 one thousand thousand gross register tons (grt). Against this, the projected almanac demand during the balance of the 1970s and the early years of the 1980s is estimated at 10–13 million grt.45 In 1977 production was estimated at xx million grt owing to the deport-over of orders from previous years: with present chapters estimated at 39 million grt, the full burden of the problem is likely to be felt in 1978 and 1979 (see Table viii).

Table 8.

Shipbuilding: Production, 1975, and Projected Product, 1980 and 1985

(In million cgrt unless otherwise stated) 1

article image

Source: Commission des Communautés Européennes, Assainissement du secteur de la construction navale dans la Communauté (Brussels, December 6, 1977), Annex I, p. 6.

Compensated gross register ton (cgrt) takes into account the amount of work per gross register ton (grt).

Association of W European Shipbuilders (EEC countries, Finland, Kingdom of norway, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden).

A number of measures have been adopted to cope with these problems. On the national level, policies have included employment measures (e.g., elimination of overtime, reduced working hours, encouragements to go out, and minimum recruitment). Information technology has been estimated that since 1975 the number of jobs available in the eec shipbuilding industry has been reduced past about xv,000, or 8 per cent of employment in that industry, and cuts in activity in coming years may reduce employment by a further 75,000. Adjustment to the new market conditions has been difficult; and in some countries, rather than encouraging adjustment, governments have provided support to their national shipbuilding industries in guild to maintain a loftier level of employment. Promotion of national shipbuilding has taken many forms. In some shipyards work is maintained by placing orders for naval vessels, but in about cases intervention is financial. Information technology has been estimated that assistance now existence granted in Europe to overcome the price advantage of competitors is EUR 600 meg a year.46 If the level of employment in shipbuilding is to be maintained, such assist would accept to increase considering activity is expected to continue to driblet and contest from other countries to continue to abound.

At the international level, a Working Political party of the oecd was created in the mid-1960s to try to reduce trade barriers. 2 arrangements were concluded through the Working Party, including a general, renewable, iii-yr arrangement for the removal of obstacles to merchandise in ships,47 and an understanding on oecd export credits specifying minimum credit terms. In May 1976 the member countries of the Working Party agreed on "Full general Guidelines for Regime Policies in the Shipbuilding Industry"; 1 of the purposes is an appropriate reduction of productive chapters in society to restore a remainder betwixt supply and demand. Also, a reporting system has been established to allow the oecd to monitor new orders, gild books, product, employment, etc., in the shipbuilding sector.

The longer-term trouble of the shipbuilding industry is its adaptation to the hereafter level of demand, taking into account some 4 million grt of capacity outside the industrial countries and the intentions of some countries to expand capacity substantially.

Demand and Difficulty of Structural Adjustment

While the recent surge in protectionism has coincided with extraordinary supply shocks and a astringent worldwide recession, information technology likewise has roots in longer-term developments. These include the stagnation or deceleration of population growth in the industrial countries, the tendency of wage differentials within these economies to be maintained or fifty-fifty narrowed, and, as discussed in a higher place, the growing shift of comparative advantage in certain products to the developing countries.48

The stagnation or wearisome growth of population in industrial countries ways that in order for the more than dynamic sectors to achieve their growth potential, adequate increases in labor productivity or declines in action and employment in other sectors are required. While relative wages should reverberate these differentials in productivity among sectors, a recent study of manufacturing in Western Europe found that, except for the Federal Republic of Germany, there were greater disparities in the rates of growth of productivity than in the rates of wage increase, and that there was a significant negative relationship betwixt the ii variables.49 In other words, the stickiness of relative wages has meant that wages accept risen at broadly like rates despite differences in the growth of productivity among sectors. The effect is that, despite secular labor mobility, intersectoral transfers of labor take not been encouraged through the wage mechanism. With wages rise faster than productivity in the less dynamic industries, profitability has declined. At the aforementioned time, many of these less dynamic industries have also had to cope with increased external pressures owing to growing competition from foreign sources of supply. The pressure for higher prices to meliorate profitability—which, to a varying extent, could be achieved through relief from import competition—and the competition from imports have contributed significantly to the gradual building up of protectionist pressures.

The procedure of structural adjustment, nonetheless, faces certain impediments, and the success of programs of adjustment—whether carried out past firms or sponsored past governments—depends to a big extent on the severity of these impediments. In particular, the reallocation of resources is a slow and often costly procedure and one that ordinarily meets with considerable resistance from both manufacture and merchandise unions, as the gains from alternative uses of resources are not then perceived by the affected groups and economical stimuli are not sufficient. Too, it is often difficult to readapt or relocate the piece of work strength in the affected industry because the sectors almost seriously affected are likely to use a higher share of older, or other relatively less mobile, workers than manufacture every bit a whole. This problem is compounded where there are concentrations of unskilled labor—frequently the grouping that is in jeopardy—in particular regions. Information technology must likewise be noted that it is considerably easier to attain structural adjustment in a buoyant economic system than in a sluggish one: in a buoyant economy, labor mobility is greater than in an economic system characterized by high unemployment and reduced opportunities for resources employ.50

Adjustment Assistance

In recent discussions of protectionism in various forums, at that place accept been frequent calls, especially from developing countries, for adjustment assist as an culling to restrictive trade actions by adult countries.51 From an international viewpoint, the purpose of adjustment help is to allow the pursuit of liberal trading policies by alleviating the hardships associated with the need to arrange to the increased imports that may issue from such policies. To this extent, the apply of "escape clause" measures (i.e., temporary restrictions in response to a sudden surge of imports that injures or threatens injury) should be linked to adjustment assistance, which should allow countries to shift resources from affected industries to more than advantageous lines of production and thus requite some assurance that the emergency "escape clause" restrictions will be temporary. In the context of a liberal commercial policy, the proper role of adjustment help is seen every bit the provision of relief from excessive hardship brought on by increased imports, without unduly hampering the longer-term contraction of industries exposed to import contest.

By experience with adjustment assistance programs is difficult to assess, and the relevance of such programs, adopted in different circumstances, to the exigencies of present economic problems is non readily apparent. However, a survey by the oecd in 1975 suggested that such programs had been scarce. It reached 4 general and tentative conclusions:

  • one) The deportation effect of imports from developing countries has been minimal when seen in relation to the magnitude of total structural modify in industrialised countries.

  • 2) No industrialised countries have so far pursued adjustment assistance policies specifically designed to promote imports from developing countries, although a few attempts have been made to accelerate the contraction of individual sectors.

  • 3) More than frequently, withal, public policy has sought to delay the transfer of resources. The greatest contribution to rapid reallocation has probably been the pursuit of full employment and a more often than not high level of demand.

  • iv) The pursuit of an improved international division of labour is not a matter but of trade policy and merchandise-focussed adjustment measures. Developed countries must direct their attention to the whole circuitous of structural, regional, and employment policies in their countries. If these policies are to promote rather than thwart the expansion of exports from developing countries they must non remain politically and administratively isolated from trade policy.52

Other analyses of structural changes and adjustment assistance programs have shown that, with few exceptions, there have been no concerted or adequate efforts past governments to bring virtually the required adjustments, and the adjustment that has taken place has been the result of normal market place changes and high growth rates. In effect, governments often accept used the resources available for adjustment assist every bit complicated income-back up schemes for bilious industries. While this may have alleviated the financial state of affairs of the corresponding industries, it has made scant contribution to the underlying problems of adjustment.53

Monetary Disturbances

Some other factor that has been suggested as contributing to the rising in protectionism is the disturbed world monetary conditions following the breakdown of the par value arrangement in 1971.54 The general premise is often put forward that during a catamenia of high aggrandizement and fluctuating currencies—such as has existed since early in 1973—the failure of exchange rates to reflect sharply differing rates of inflation adequately leads to pressures for trade measures in club to regain some of the competitiveness lost—or to foreclose new external contest—owing to the differential toll movements. This, even so, does not appear to be a valid explanation for the ascent in protectionist pressures during the period under study as far as the major industrial countries are concerned. Information technology appears that, on the whole, since early 1973 changes in substitution rates have tended to outset differences in the rates of aggrandizement among the industrial countries.55

Even in the absence of offsetting movements in exchange rates and prices, notwithstanding, the accent put on fluctuations in exchange rates ignores the fact that the payments imbalance underlying the rate adjustment must result in a similar realignment of competitive positions under either fixed or flexible commutation rates. Changes in exchange rates have an immediate and readily identifiable touch on the competitive position of domestic producers in both local and export markets. Nether fixed exchange rates, the readjustment of competitive positions takes place as the payments imbalance, through its effect on domestic liquidity, is reflected in coin incomes and in pressures on domestic prices and wages. In short, the adjustment of prices sufficient to generate the reallocation of resources consistent with the new balance of payments equilibrium requires either a more rapid cost increase or currency appreciation in the surplus country relative to the deficit country. On the other hand, to the extent that domestic prices and costs are not affected immediately by the payments imbalance, the aligning of the competitive position of domestic producers is likely to be less rapid under a system of fixed exchange rates.

Available evidence suggests that payments imbalances or fluctuations in exchange rates have not been a major factor in the increasing resort to trade restrictions, at least as far equally the major trading nations are concerned. In the period 1971–76, simply 2 major trading countries (the United states of america in 1971 and Italia in 1974 and 1976), under exceptional circumstances, resorted to merchandise restrictions for admittedly balance of payments reasons.56 But in the same flow several smaller developed countries and many developing countries had recourse to such measures. Details are given in Appendix IX.

starkeydamend.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/books/054/14016-9781451976632-en/ch03.xml

0 Response to "Protectionism: Trade Policy in Democratic Societies by Jan Tumlir Read"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel